shibboleth-dev - RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: Jim Fox <>
- To:
- Subject: RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?
- Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 10:43:37 -0800 (PST)
FWIW, I just did a clean rebuild on RH4 and it defined the macro without any
trouble.
Please send me the error from the other branch anyway, that's still a bug,
and the code should compile on that branch on all platforms no matter what.
I am looking at the source tar (opensaml-2.0.tar.gz) from the beta2
download site and at the code in svn.
There used to be in configure.ac, about line 220, a test for
HAVE_GOOD_STL. Starting, "# Does the STL in use help or screw us?"
That put the "define HAVE_GOOD_STL 1" into config.h.
That test for HAVE_GOOD_STL is missing from configure.ac in both
the svn source and in the source tar of the beta2 download.
If I restore the test to configure everything works as before.
Jim
- missing definition in sp beta 2?, Jim Fox, 12/06/2007
- RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?, Scott Cantor, 12/06/2007
- RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?, Jim Fox, 12/06/2007
- RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?, Scott Cantor, 12/06/2007
- RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?, Jim Fox, 12/06/2007
- RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?, Scott Cantor, 12/06/2007
- RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?, Jim Fox, 12/06/2007
- RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?, Scott Cantor, 12/06/2007
- RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?, Jim Fox, 12/06/2007
- RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?, Scott Cantor, 12/06/2007
- RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?, Jim Fox, 12/06/2007
- RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?, Scott Cantor, 12/06/2007
- RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?, Jim Fox, 12/06/2007
- RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?, Scott Cantor, 12/06/2007
- RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?, Jim Fox, 12/06/2007
- RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?, Scott Cantor, 12/06/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.