shibboleth-dev - RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: "Scott Cantor" <>
- To: <>
- Subject: RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?
- Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 12:53:44 -0500
- Organization: The Ohio State University
> The SP used to define and use a symbol "HAVE_GOOD_STL".
> It doesn't appear in the configure script or config.h
> anymore.
It hasn't changed...it's a configure test. Are you on a different compiler
now? I'll check, but don't think I changed anything that would impact that.
> However, it is still used, at least in
> "MetadataImpl.cpp", where it causes my compile to
> fail. I used to compile the 'if have good stl' section.
> Now it's trying to compile the 'else' section and
> failing.
I need the error, the else sections don't get hit much, so there are
probably bugs in them. I don't have any active platforms that have broken
(for some definition) STLs.
-- Scott
- missing definition in sp beta 2?, Jim Fox, 12/06/2007
- RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?, Scott Cantor, 12/06/2007
- RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?, Jim Fox, 12/06/2007
- RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?, Scott Cantor, 12/06/2007
- RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?, Jim Fox, 12/06/2007
- RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?, Scott Cantor, 12/06/2007
- RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?, Jim Fox, 12/06/2007
- RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?, Scott Cantor, 12/06/2007
- RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?, Jim Fox, 12/06/2007
- RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?, Scott Cantor, 12/06/2007
- RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?, Jim Fox, 12/06/2007
- RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?, Scott Cantor, 12/06/2007
- RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?, Jim Fox, 12/06/2007
- RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?, Scott Cantor, 12/06/2007
- RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?, Jim Fox, 12/06/2007
- RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?, Scott Cantor, 12/06/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.