shibboleth-dev - RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: "Scott Cantor" <>
- To: <>
- Subject: RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?
- Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 13:14:53 -0500
- Organization: The Ohio State University
> It has changed. The test is no longer in configure.
> That's the problem.
It's in subversion, line 293.
# Does the STL in use help or screw us?
AC_TRY_LINK(
[#include <string>],
[std::basic_string<unsigned short> foo; foo=foo+(unsigned short)65],
[AC_DEFINE(HAVE_GOOD_STL,1,
[Define if you have an STL implementation that supports useful
string specialization.])],
)
I do recall moving it lower in the file, but that shouldn't matter. I also
have numerous copies of that code configured on Linux hosts that show the
macro defined. I will do a clean and then start over to make sure.
What platform is it? Is the #undefined version of that macro in
config_pub.h?
-- Scott
- missing definition in sp beta 2?, Jim Fox, 12/06/2007
- RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?, Scott Cantor, 12/06/2007
- RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?, Jim Fox, 12/06/2007
- RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?, Scott Cantor, 12/06/2007
- RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?, Jim Fox, 12/06/2007
- RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?, Scott Cantor, 12/06/2007
- RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?, Jim Fox, 12/06/2007
- RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?, Scott Cantor, 12/06/2007
- RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?, Jim Fox, 12/06/2007
- RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?, Scott Cantor, 12/06/2007
- RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?, Jim Fox, 12/06/2007
- RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?, Scott Cantor, 12/06/2007
- RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?, Jim Fox, 12/06/2007
- RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?, Scott Cantor, 12/06/2007
- RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?, Jim Fox, 12/06/2007
- RE: missing definition in sp beta 2?, Scott Cantor, 12/06/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.