shibboleth-dev - RE: signed assertions
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: "Scott Cantor" <>
- To: <>
- Subject: RE: signed assertions
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 10:39:30 -0500
- Organization: The Ohio State University
> I'll leave you to file the bugzilla report so that you can claim your
> stuffed animal from Howard at the same time.
It's Walter's code, not Howard's. I patched HEAD, I'll backport the fix now.
> Unfortunately I now observe that the new-style ePTI values aren't
> actually making it through to the application headers.
Confirmed on my side, please file a bug on this.
> Now I know this used to work (I have seen the a!b!c format in CGI
> variables),
Me too, so it seems like a regression.
-- Scott
- RE: signed assertions, (continued)
- RE: signed assertions, Scott Cantor, 02/21/2006
- Re: signed assertions, Ian Young, 02/21/2006
- RE: signed assertions, Scott Cantor, 02/21/2006
- Re: signed assertions, Ian Young, 02/21/2006
- RE: signed assertions, Scott Cantor, 02/21/2006
- Re: signed assertions, Ian Young, 02/21/2006
- RE: signed assertions, Scott Cantor, 02/21/2006
- Re: signed assertions, Ian Young, 02/21/2006
- RE: signed assertions, Scott Cantor, 02/21/2006
- Re: signed assertions, Ian Young, 02/22/2006
- RE: signed assertions, Scott Cantor, 02/22/2006
- Re: signed assertions, Walter Hoehn, 02/22/2006
- RE: signed assertions, Scott Cantor, 02/22/2006
- Re: signed assertions, Ian Young, 02/22/2006
- RE: signed assertions, Scott Cantor, 02/22/2006
- Re: signed assertions, Ian Young, 02/22/2006
- RE: signed assertions, Scott Cantor, 02/22/2006
- Re: signed assertions, Ian Young, 02/22/2006
- RE: signed assertions, Scott Cantor, 02/22/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.