shibboleth-dev - RE: signed assertions
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: "Scott Cantor" <>
- To: <>
- Subject: RE: signed assertions
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 13:05:47 -0500
- Organization: The Ohio State University
> rpm -q opensaml says opensaml-1.1-5, I'm afraid. On the other hand,
> that machine hasn't been rebooted for two months, I suppose there is a
> slim possibility that I am actually seeing a prior version of
> the library.
I was also unable to locate any relevant changes in cvs. I think there's a
bug, but it's of the random variety. Restarting things seems to have caused
the header to appear in the only case it wasn't, and since then it keeps
showing up.
I think it's related to the warning you saw showing up for no reason.
Something's not right, but I'll be surprised if I find anything before 2.0
changes all the code anyway.
-- Scott
- RE: signed assertions, (continued)
- RE: signed assertions, Scott Cantor, 02/21/2006
- Re: signed assertions, Ian Young, 02/21/2006
- RE: signed assertions, Scott Cantor, 02/21/2006
- Re: signed assertions, Ian Young, 02/22/2006
- RE: signed assertions, Scott Cantor, 02/22/2006
- Re: signed assertions, Walter Hoehn, 02/22/2006
- RE: signed assertions, Scott Cantor, 02/22/2006
- Re: signed assertions, Ian Young, 02/22/2006
- RE: signed assertions, Scott Cantor, 02/22/2006
- Re: signed assertions, Ian Young, 02/22/2006
- RE: signed assertions, Scott Cantor, 02/22/2006
- Re: signed assertions, Ian Young, 02/22/2006
- RE: signed assertions, Scott Cantor, 02/22/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.