shibboleth-dev - RE: signed assertions

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

RE: signed assertions

From: "Scott Cantor" <>
To: <>
Subject: RE: signed assertions
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 16:18:17 -0500
Organization: The Ohio State University

> I don't think the assertion got signed. I attach what I think is your
> one. I went through Example State myself and got something very similar
> (again unsigned).

You're right. I corrected the metadata and it signed it now. Check yor log.

-- Scott

signed assertions, Ian Young, 02/21/2006
- RE: signed assertions, Scott Cantor, 02/21/2006
  - Re: signed assertions, Ian Young, 02/21/2006
    - RE: signed assertions, Scott Cantor, 02/21/2006
      - Re: signed assertions, Ian Young, 02/21/2006
        
        RE: signed assertions, Scott Cantor, 02/21/2006
        
        Re: signed assertions, Ian Young, 02/21/2006
        
        RE: signed assertions, Scott Cantor, 02/21/2006
        Re: signed assertions, Ian Young, 02/21/2006
        RE: signed assertions, Scott Cantor, 02/21/2006
        Re: signed assertions, Ian Young, 02/21/2006
        RE: signed assertions, Scott Cantor, 02/21/2006
        
        RE: signed assertions, Scott Cantor, 02/21/2006
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: signed assertions, Scott Cantor, 02/21/2006
  - Re: signed assertions, Ian Young, 02/22/2006
    - RE: signed assertions, Scott Cantor, 02/22/2006
      - Re: signed assertions, Walter Hoehn, 02/22/2006
    - RE: signed assertions, Scott Cantor, 02/22/2006
      - Re: signed assertions, Ian Young, 02/22/2006
        
        RE: signed assertions, Scott Cantor, 02/22/2006

List archive

RE: signed assertions