Shibboleth Developers

[Ian Young <>]

Scott Cantor wrote:

> > rpm -q opensaml says opensaml-1.1-5, I'm afraid.  On the other hand, 
> > that machine hasn't been rebooted for two months, I suppose there is a 
> > slim possibility that I am actually seeing a prior version of 
> > the library.
>
> I was also unable to locate any relevant changes in cvs. I think there's a
> bug, but it's of the random variety. Restarting things seems to have caused
> the header to appear in the only case it wasn't, and since then it keeps
> showing up.
>
> I think it's related to the warning you saw showing up for no reason.
> Something's not right, but I'll be surprised if I find anything before 2.0
> changes all the code anyway.

I restarted that machine, and as feared I now see both kinds of targeted 
ID appearing in their respective places on the test SP.

I think you're right... something wrong, but really hard to figure out 
exactly what.  I'll let you know if I notice a recurrence.

        -- Ian