List archive

• 05/04/19
  • Re: First draft of eduPerson/SAML profiles, Keith Hazelton
  • Re: First draft of eduPerson/SAML profiles, Tom Scavo
  • Re: First draft of eduPerson/SAML profiles, Tom Scavo
  • Re: First draft of eduPerson/SAML profiles, Tom Scavo
  • Re: First draft of eduPerson/SAML profiles, Alistair Young
  • RE: First draft of eduPerson/SAML profiles, Scott Cantor
  • RE: First draft of eduPerson/SAML profiles, Scott Cantor
  • RE: First draft of eduPerson/SAML profiles, Scott Cantor
  • RE: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Scott Cantor
  • Re: First draft of eduPerson/SAML profiles, Tom Scavo
  • Re: First draft of eduPerson/SAML profiles, Tom Scavo
  • RE: First draft of eduPerson/SAML profiles, Alistair Young
  • RE: First draft of eduPerson/SAML profiles, Scott Cantor
  • RE: First draft of eduPerson/SAML profiles, Scott Cantor
  • RE: First draft of eduPerson/SAML profiles, Scott Cantor
  • Re: First draft of eduPerson/SAML profiles, Walter Hoehn
• 05/04/20
  • Re: First draft of eduPerson/SAML profiles, RL 'Bob' Morgan
  • Re: First draft of eduPerson/SAML profiles, Alistair Young
  • Re: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Sassa
  • Re: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Olivier Salaün - CRU
  • Re: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Sassa
  • RE: First draft of eduPerson/SAML profiles, Scott Cantor
  • RE: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Scott Cantor
  • RE: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Scott Cantor
  • Re: Chances for audit logging in 1.3?, Thomas Lenggenhager
  • RE: Chances for audit logging in 1.3?, Scott Cantor
  • NameQualifier, Tom Scavo
• 05/04/21
  • Re: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Thomas Lenggenhager
  • RE: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Scott Cantor
  • Re: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Thomas Lenggenhager

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.