shibboleth-dev - Re: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious)
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: Sassa <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious)
- Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 10:30:44 +0100
Scott Cantor wrote:
these situations, the national WAYF is indeed not adapted at all because it lists too many sites. On the other hand these institutions don't really want to build a regional federation; they just need a regional WAYF or a local WAYF builtin with the SP.
Exactly, the latter especially. That's my point. Proliferating WAYFs is why
ultimately the SP has to deal with this.
If the problem is that the list is too long, why can't WAYF categorize
the sites, so the user would have two options: look through the whole
list, or tree walk the categories and sub-categories. In essence, WAYF
can be an LDAP browser, and the users choose:
C=US,
then
S=Utah
then
O=Little College in the Desert
- and get redirected to the corresponding site.
Sassa
- Re: WAYF cookie considered dubious, Olivier Salaün - CRU, 04/18/2005
- RE: WAYF cookie considered dubious, Scott Cantor, 04/18/2005
- Re: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Olivier Salaün - CRU, 04/19/2005
- RE: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Scott Cantor, 04/19/2005
- Re: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Sassa, 04/20/2005
- Re: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Olivier Salaün - CRU, 04/20/2005
- Re: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Sassa, 04/20/2005
- RE: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Scott Cantor, 04/20/2005
- Re: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Thomas Lenggenhager, 04/21/2005
- RE: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Scott Cantor, 04/21/2005
- Re: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Thomas Lenggenhager, 04/21/2005
- Re: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Tom Scavo, 04/21/2005
- RE: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Scott Cantor, 04/21/2005
- Re: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Sassa, 04/20/2005
- Re: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Olivier Salaün - CRU, 04/20/2005
- Re: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Sassa, 04/20/2005
- RE: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Scott Cantor, 04/19/2005
- Re: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Olivier Salaün - CRU, 04/19/2005
- RE: WAYF cookie considered dubious, Scott Cantor, 04/18/2005
- RE: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Scott Cantor, 04/20/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.