shibboleth-dev - Re: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious)
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: Thomas Lenggenhager <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious)
- Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 10:38:46 +0200
How about a flexible and lightweight WAYF? It could be used either
- centrally in a federation for all SPs who do not want
to care about an own WAYF, or
- as a local WAYF run by an SP with just a list of its partner IdPs.
We are thinking about implementing such a WAYF in PHP (since
we know it better than JSP) which could look like this:
- preprocess the sites.xml into a PHP include file which contains
the required information in a PHP data structure.
This preprocessing could exclude and merge IdPs as required
for the purpose. It off-loads the XML parsing from the WAYF
and is only necessary whenever the input changes.
One could also imagine to support a hierarchical data structure
allowing to group IdPs on whatever criteria needed, e.g.
geographical or type of institution.
- an additional permanent cookie stores the IdP selected at
the last visit.
That is not intended for fully automatic redirection as the
current session cookie. But in case there is no session cookie
set it allows to preselect the IdP that in most cases a user
will only have to hit OK. Unless he has multiple identities at
different IdPs.
- the WAYF will read the include file and process the cookies
to present the IdP selection list to the user.
Thomas
- Re: WAYF cookie considered dubious, Olivier Salaün - CRU, 04/18/2005
- RE: WAYF cookie considered dubious, Scott Cantor, 04/18/2005
- Re: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Olivier Salaün - CRU, 04/19/2005
- RE: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Scott Cantor, 04/19/2005
- Re: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Sassa, 04/20/2005
- Re: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Olivier Salaün - CRU, 04/20/2005
- Re: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Sassa, 04/20/2005
- RE: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Scott Cantor, 04/20/2005
- Re: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Thomas Lenggenhager, 04/21/2005
- RE: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Scott Cantor, 04/21/2005
- Re: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Thomas Lenggenhager, 04/21/2005
- Re: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Tom Scavo, 04/21/2005
- RE: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Scott Cantor, 04/21/2005
- Re: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Sassa, 04/20/2005
- Re: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Olivier Salaün - CRU, 04/20/2005
- Re: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Sassa, 04/20/2005
- RE: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Scott Cantor, 04/19/2005
- Re: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Olivier Salaün - CRU, 04/19/2005
- RE: WAYF cookie considered dubious, Scott Cantor, 04/18/2005
- RE: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Scott Cantor, 04/20/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.