shibboleth-dev - RE: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious)
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: "Scott Cantor" <>
- To: "'Sassa'" <>, <>
- Subject: RE: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious)
- Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 10:29:11 -0400
- Organization: The Ohio State University
> If the problem is that the list is too long, why can't WAYF categorize
> the sites, so the user would have two options: look through the whole
> list, or tree walk the categories and sub-categories. In essence, WAYF
> can be an LDAP browser, and the users choose:
In a multi-fed world, you've presupposed the WAYF equivalent of X.500.
DNS is a global distributed directory that didn't fail. And it may be that
working with some combination of DNS records and new-fangled XRIs or
something may be the solution here.
But I doubt tying to build *another* global distributed directory is
realistic any time soon.
That's why we're being cautious about all this.
-- Scott
- RE: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), (continued)
- RE: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Scott Cantor, 04/19/2005
- Re: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Sassa, 04/20/2005
- Re: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Olivier Salaün - CRU, 04/20/2005
- Re: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Sassa, 04/20/2005
- RE: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Scott Cantor, 04/20/2005
- Re: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Thomas Lenggenhager, 04/21/2005
- RE: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Scott Cantor, 04/21/2005
- Re: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Thomas Lenggenhager, 04/21/2005
- Re: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Tom Scavo, 04/21/2005
- RE: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Scott Cantor, 04/21/2005
- Re: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Sassa, 04/20/2005
- Re: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Olivier Salaün - CRU, 04/20/2005
- Re: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Sassa, 04/20/2005
- RE: WAYF talks (was WAYF cookie considered dubious), Scott Cantor, 04/19/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.