perfsonar development work

[Roman Lapacz <>]

Nina Jeliazkova wrote:
> > > The others are protocol and profile. (See attached message.)
> > >
> > > I'm not convinced that a message-parameter is really enough here for 
> > > the 'general' solution. I suspect we may want this information 
> > > published to the LS somehow as well. But, I guess something like 
> > > this would at least be a start.
> From client point of view, a client needs to "know" the 
> protocol/schema version,  _before_ sending a message, in order to 
> generate the correct message.
> If the protocol info is inside the message, there is no much options 
> how the client will "bootstrap".
> Therefore, my preferences are for having version info in LS.

I agree. If LS is not present the option is getting general info 
(including version number) from the service directly 
(LookupInfoRequest/Response). Of course service URL must be known.

Roman