perfsonar development work

[Andreas Hanemann <>]

Hi Nicolas,

David and I share the opinion of Nina and would prefer that the URL does 
not contain a version and is therefore more stable. Otherwise, it may be 
unclear if the service has been updated or is unavailable.

Nicolas Simar schrieb:
> Hi Loukik, Michalis
>
> Can you tell about the rationale for having the release version name?
>
> Hi Nina and Andreas,
>
> Would you prefer to limit the URL changes of the web-services or do 
> you prefer to have the product version in the URL?
>
> Cheers,
> Nicolas
>
> Maciej Glowiak wrote:
> > Nicolas Simar wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > looking at the web-services names
> > > http://rrd-ma.perfsonar.xxx:8080/perfSONAR-RRD-MA-2.2/services/MeasurementArchiveService 
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I see there is a part mentioning the service version(2.2). Is there a
> > > particular benefit of seeing the service version?
> > >
> > > I am wondering about this, because when the service will be updated, 
> > > the
> > > version will be updated and the tools won't be able to access it until
> > > they are updated.
> > > It this statement correct?
> >
> >
> >
> > Nicolas,
> >
> > AFAIR it was a requirement from Release Mgmt. Team for perfSONAR 2.0.
> > You should contact Loukik or Luis in order to get more information about
> > the reason for using version number.
> >
> > Anyway, Ilias and Roman are right - that's default name (contaning
> > version number) and everybody can change it after the installation.