perfsonar development work

[Chris Welti <>]

Hi all,

I agree with David, Andreas & Nina, there should be only one stable URL name 
be used for each service.

Chris

Andreas Hanemann wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
> 
> David and I share the opinion of Nina and would prefer that the URL does
> not contain a version and is therefore more stable. Otherwise, it may be
> unclear if the service has been updated or is unavailable.
> 
> Nicolas Simar schrieb:
>> Hi Loukik, Michalis
>>
>> Can you tell about the rationale for having the release version name?
>>
>> Hi Nina and Andreas,
>>
>> Would you prefer to limit the URL changes of the web-services or do
>> you prefer to have the product version in the URL?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Nicolas
>>
>> Maciej Glowiak wrote:
>>> Nicolas Simar wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> looking at the web-services names
>>>> http://rrd-ma.perfsonar.xxx:8080/perfSONAR-RRD-MA-2.2/services/MeasurementArchiveService
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I see there is a part mentioning the service version(2.2). Is there a
>>>> particular benefit of seeing the service version?
>>>>
>>>> I am wondering about this, because when the service will be updated,
>>>> the
>>>> version will be updated and the tools won't be able to access it until
>>>> they are updated.
>>>> It this statement correct?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Nicolas,
>>>
>>> AFAIR it was a requirement from Release Mgmt. Team for perfSONAR 2.0.
>>> You should contact Loukik or Luis in order to get more information about
>>> the reason for using version number.
>>>
>>> Anyway, Ilias and Roman are right - that's default name (contaning
>>> version number) and everybody can change it after the installation.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>