perfsonar development work

[Nicolas Simar <>]

Jason Zurawski wrote:
> David;
>
> > Jason, from your point of view, which of the schema proposals could be
> > easily made ready for immediate use next week?
> >
> >   
>
>
> In my opinion we should proceed with the method that best maps reality, 
> not which is fastest to implement.  It would be great to hear comments 
> on both methods from various interested parties soon (and if its next 
> week you are looking to implement, comments need to come *very* soon).

I guess that the interested parties are:
- the visualisation developers: Nina/Vedrin (psUI), David/Andreas (CNM), 
Daniel(visualperfSONAR)
- the web-service developers: Roman (RRD), Jeff/Jason (SNMP MP)

Have I missed somebody?

Nicolas

> > Do you foresee an easy way starting with only the basic
> > features necessary (for next week), while not much complicating the
> > later integration of more complex features (e.g. tool namespace snmp)?
> >   
>
>
> Any or all of the standard we choose can be implemented to start with, 
> as long as everything is fully implemented in the end.  in my opinion 
> keeping things 'similar' to the characteristic style (similar to 
> utilization) is the fastest route to start with (both for getting 
> comments on this list and for allowing service developers to get 
> started).  No matter which method we choose it is imperative that 
> extension be possible in the future (i.e. to the SNMP namespace, etc.).
>
> -jason

--
Nicolas
______________________________________________________________________

Nicolas Simar
Network Engineer

DANTE - www.dante.net

Tel - BE: +32 (0) 4 366 93 49
Tel - UK: +44 (0)1223 371 300
Mobile: +44 (0) 7740 176 883

City House, 126-130 Hills Road
Cambridge CB2 1PQ
UK
_____________________________________________________________________