perfsonar development work

[David Schmitz <>]

Hi Jason,

> Szymon;
> 
> > > The branch can be found here:
> > >
> > > <https://svn.internet2.edu/svn/nmwg/branches/snmp/>http://anonsvn.internet2.edu/svn/nmwg/branches/snmp/
> > > <https://svn.internet2.edu/svn/nmwg/branches/snmp/>
> > >
> > > The most interesting parts (i.e. the parts that everyone should read
> > > *VERY* carefully and comment on) are here:
> > >
> > > TODO_SNMP.txt
> >
> > Where is the above file? I can't find it
> >
> 
> In that branch:
> 
> http://anonsvn.internet2.edu/svn/nmwg/branches/snmp/TODO_SNMP.txt
> 
> 
> > > example_instances/(snmp|utilization|errors|discards)/*xml
> > > rnc/(snmp|utilization|errors|discards).rnc
> > >
> > > There are a lot of new concepts, and some comments on the current state 
> > > of
> > > things (both service and protocol wise) that potentially could change 
> > > with
> > > the adoption of some of these ideas.  Please read and comment
> > > appropriately.
> >
> > How does your proposal relate to the work David was doing on new SNMP
> > counters and the schemas he sent?
> >
> 
> David has proposed a standalone schema similar to the utilization
> characteristic.  We have done somthing similar for errors and drops, but 
> have
> tied all of these together along with the tool namespace snmp.  Reading the
> examples will probably help to make more sense in explaining how the 4 will
> interact together.

Jason, from your point of view, which of the schema proposals could be
easily made ready for immediate use next week?

Do you foresee an easy way starting with only the basic
features necessary (for next week), while not much complicating the
later integration of more complex features (e.g. tool namespace snmp)?


Best Regards
David

-- 

David Schmitz

Boltzmannstraße 1, 85748 Garching
Telefon:   +49 89 35831-8765
Fax:       +49 89 35831-9700
Leibniz-Rechenzentrum, Germany
Mail: