Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

perfsonar-dev - Re: perfsonarUI - which Java version is preferred ? [was: [pS-dev] flow S&A MA GUI as perfsonarUI plugin?]

Subject: perfsonar development work

List archive

Re: perfsonarUI - which Java version is preferred ? [was: [pS-dev] flow S&A MA GUI as perfsonarUI plugin?]


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Nina Jeliazkova" <>
  • To: Gijs Molenaar <>, "Nina Jeliazkova" <>
  • Cc: <>, GN-JRA1-list <>
  • Subject: Re: perfsonarUI - which Java version is preferred ? [was: [pS-dev] flow S&A MA GUI as perfsonarUI plugin?]
  • Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 10:37:49 +0300

Hello Gijs, All,

I think the best is to get user and developers feedback on this issue.

Currently perfsonarUI compiles under Java 5.0 and higher. Gijs submitted some
plugin UI code which needs Java 6.0. So far the options for perfsonarUI are:

- Upgrade to Java 6.0 and abandon 5.0 support;
- Stay with Java 5.0 for now and provide different build file for the plugins;
- Force all plugins to use same version (Java 5.0 currently);
- Anything else?


Best regards,
Nina





Gijs Molenaar
<>
wrote:

> Nina Jeliazkova schreef:
> > Hello Gijs,
> >
> > I've just noticed you are using Java 6.0 specifics in flowsa code
> > (javax.swing.GroupLayout). I am still using Java 5.0 in the development
and
> > flowsa code prevents psui to compile under 5.0. Do you absolutely need
6.0?
> >
>
> Well, the GUI builder I use (Netbeans) uses GroupLayout, new in Java 6.
> I can modify all the instances, but I prefer to use a GUI builder for
> the view of the application. By the time our plugin really becomes
> usefull java 7.0 will be out, so I think it will be okay by then - how
> many people are still using java 4 now? Otherwise we create a different
> build file for the plugin. But if you really want I can remove the
> grouplayout stuff.
>
> greetings,
>
> - gijs
>
>
>






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page