Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

perfsonar-dev - Re: perfsonarUI - which Java version is preferred ? [was: [pS-dev] flow S&A MA GUI as perfsonarUI plugin?]

Subject: perfsonar development work

List archive

Re: perfsonarUI - which Java version is preferred ? [was: [pS-dev] flow S&A MA GUI as perfsonarUI plugin?]


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Roland Karch <>
  • To: <>, GN-JRA1-list <>
  • Subject: Re: perfsonarUI - which Java version is preferred ? [was: [pS-dev] flow S&A MA GUI as perfsonarUI plugin?]
  • Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 12:30:56 +0200

At 09:37 05.06.2007, Nina Jeliazkova wrote:
I think the best is to get user and developers feedback on this issue.

Currently perfsonarUI compiles under Java 5.0 and higher. Gijs submitted some
plugin UI code which needs Java 6.0. So far the options for perfsonarUI are:

- Upgrade to Java 6.0 and abandon 5.0 support;
- Stay with Java 5.0 for now and provide different build file for the plugins;
- Force all plugins to use same version (Java 5.0 currently);
- Anything else?

For the BWCTL plugin, my Java development environment is currently version 5. I really have no idea about the implications of upgrading to 6. I'd assume it just requires a download from SUN and then to recompile everything. If so, it would be nothing more than a minor inconvenience since Java 5 is already bundled with Debian, and I'd have to maintain an installation on my own if I were to upgrade.

A different build file for plugins might be a good idea though, I really don't like my current hack of just adding the build instructions to the main PerfsonarUI build file.

Greetings,
Roland

--

Roland Karch
DFN-Labor

Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Regionales RechenZentrum Erlangen (RRZE)
Martensstrasse 1
91058 Erlangen
Germany

Tel.:   +49 9131 85-27806, -28800
Fax:    +49 9131 302941


www.rrze.uni-erlangen.de
www-win.rrze.uni-erlangen.de



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page