Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

perfsonar-dev - Re: [GN2-JRA1] perfsonarUI - which Java version is preferred ? [was: [pS-dev] flow S&A MA GUI as perfsonarUI plugin?]

Subject: perfsonar development work

List archive

Re: [GN2-JRA1] perfsonarUI - which Java version is preferred ? [was: [pS-dev] flow S&A MA GUI as perfsonarUI plugin?]


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Nina Jeliazkova" <>
  • To: Gijs Molenaar <>, "Nina Jeliazkova" <>
  • Cc: <>, "GN-JRA1-list" <>
  • Subject: Re: [GN2-JRA1] perfsonarUI - which Java version is preferred ? [was: [pS-dev] flow S&A MA GUI as perfsonarUI plugin?]
  • Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 14:13:43 +0300

Hello Gijs,

I perfsonally prefer to include swing-layout-1.0.jar (it might be useful for
others as well) and also have separate build files for plugins. Could you
upload the jar into jar folder ?

Best regards,
Nina


Gijs Molenaar
<>
wrote:

> Nina Jeliazkova wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > Thanks everybody for the comments. So far it seems most reasonably to stay
> > with Java 5.0 for compatibility reasons. Independent to the Java version
> > selected, plugins should have build file different from the main one.
> >
>
> Hello Nina,
>
> Ok I understand this decision.
>
> But I want to add this information to the discussion; The plugin we made
> is a prototype of our application. It will not be usable for the next 2
> months, because the MA isn't finished untill then. I don't know when
> perfsonarUI 0.11 will come, but I don't think a flow S&A MA will be
> ready for production/ public testing when this release will come out.
> When there is a separate build file for the plugin, the build process of
> perfsonarui is not holden up by my code.
>
> I did some research on how to let Netbeans generate java 5 compatible
> code, and this can be done by adding the library swing-layout-1.0.jar. I
> can add this library to perfsonarUI, and remove it when java 6 is the
> way to go.
>
> Modifying the code by hand could take me some time, I prefer to put this
> time in the development of the service.
>
> So the options are:
> * Add swing-layout-1.0
> * Let the code as it is
> * Remove the plugin from SVN tree
> * Modify the code to java 5 compatible.
>
> What do you prefer?
>
> - gijs
>






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page