OpenSAML user discussion

["Scott Cantor" <>]

> At least I've got it working now, but I'm a bit concerned if there's a bug
> lurking there.

The bug that should have broken the verification is fixed, but I can't
reproduce any effect based on the original copy being around or not. For me,
it failed regardless.

Are you sure you weren't verifying something attached to the original copy
once you left it around?

> Also, I'm worried about memory leaks - it's not clear to me which objects
I
> need to delete and which are handled by the library.

The API documentation should address that for the most part. What's
specifically unclear?

-- Scott