mace-opensaml-users - RE: [OpenSAML] OpenSAML 1 to 2 transition

Subject: OpenSAML user discussion

List archive

RE: [OpenSAML] OpenSAML 1 to 2 transition

From: "Scott Cantor" <>
To: <>
Subject: RE: [OpenSAML] OpenSAML 1 to 2 transition
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 12:45:51 -0400
Organization: The Ohio State University

Alexander Müller wrote on 2009-07-08:
> Right, full SAML 2 support is - at least currently - not required.
Basically
> the functionality of SAML 1 with SAML 2.

Answering your other question, yes, you shouldn't be using SAML 1 in any new
projects or deployments. It's an obsoleted standard.

> Unfortunately I AM wedded to Java :), but the mentioned project might
> be interesting, did you mean the one at
> http://code.crt.realtors.org/projects/websso?

Yes, and the Danish implementation is another possibility. Whatever is known
is listed on the wiki.

-- Scott

OpenSAML 1 to 2 transition, Alexander Müller, 07/07/2009
- Re: [OpenSAML] OpenSAML 1 to 2 transition, Chad La Joie, 07/07/2009
  - Re: [OpenSAML] OpenSAML 1 to 2 transition, Alexander Müller, 07/07/2009
    - RE: [OpenSAML] OpenSAML 1 to 2 transition, Scott Cantor, 07/07/2009
      - RE: [OpenSAML] OpenSAML 1 to 2 transition, Alexander Müller, 07/08/2009
    - Re: [OpenSAML] OpenSAML 1 to 2 transition, Jim Fox, 07/07/2009
      - Re: [OpenSAML] OpenSAML 1 to 2 transition, Alexander Müller, 07/08/2009
    - Re: [OpenSAML] OpenSAML 1 to 2 transition, Chad La Joie, 07/07/2009
      - RE: [OpenSAML] OpenSAML 1 to 2 transition, Scott Cantor, 07/07/2009
        
        RE: [OpenSAML] OpenSAML 1 to 2 transition, Alexander Müller, 07/08/2009
        
        RE: [OpenSAML] OpenSAML 1 to 2 transition, Scott Cantor, 07/08/2009
        
        Re: [OpenSAML] OpenSAML 1 to 2 transition, Paul Hethmon, 07/08/2009
      - Re: [OpenSAML] OpenSAML 1 to 2 transition, Alexander Müller, 07/08/2009

List archive

RE: [OpenSAML] OpenSAML 1 to 2 transition