OpenSAML user discussion

["Alexander Müller" <>]

>>> On 07.07.2009 at 18:12, in message 
>>> <05c901c9ff1d$b64eecd0$22ecc670$@>,
"Scott Cantor" 
<>
 wrote:
> 
> Then you might consider one of the smaller/example implementations built on
> top of the new library.

Would you have a link to them? I tried looking in the OpenSAML and Shibboleth 
packages but couldnt find any examples - or did you mean the "Projects Using 
OpenSAML" at https://spaces.internet2.edu/display/OpenSAML/Home?

> 
> FWIW, essentially nothing if your original experience will apply, there's no
> similarity at all between the two

Yes, I noticed it is a complete rewrite, but did even the types/possibilites 
of access change/vanish (like passing a SAML request "easily" from/to a 
HttpServletRequest)? I would (have) assume(d) they would remain - even if the 
calls/classes would change.

> other than the lack of documentation and
> examples.

:)


Thanks,
Alexander