OpenSAML user discussion

["Scott Cantor" <>]

Brent Putman wrote on 2009-02-09:
> On the other hand... if the sender did include xsi:type, and if it's
> OpenSAML processing it, it would handle that just fine with the custom
> provider type, assuming you have properly registered it of course.

Yes, unless you're validating, in which case you also need the schema, which 
is a problem when you don't know what somebody might send you. xsi:type 
effectively makes validation impossible in the face of extension. Let's face 
it, XSD is just broken.

-- Scott