OpenSAML user discussion

[Bradley Beddoes <>]

Hi,
I've actually been working with Google on SAML directly and I've 
actually asked them to fix this issue and was assured that it was fixed.

I haven't got around to testing it once they let me know it was sorted, 
I will test again. If its still buggy (from what you say it is!) I will 
speak to their devs again and report back.

regards,
Bradley

Paul Hethmon wrote:
> You know, I pretty well figured that was the answer, but thought it worth 
> asking.
>
> I'll change my copy, build and give it a try and let everyone know the 
> outcome.
>
> thanks,
>
> Paul
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chad La Joie 
> [mailto:]
> Sent: Tue 8/7/2007 8:38 PM
> To: 
>
> Subject: Re: More Google Fun
>  
> No, afraid not.
>
> It's unfortunate that they have such a poor SAML implementation.
>
> Paul Hethmon wrote:
>   
> > Ok. So now Google is telling me to drop the milliseconds part of 
> > timestamps used in the SAML Response. I don't see an easy way to 
> > accomplish that short of mucking with each individual class. Obviously 
> > the spec allows milliseconds to be presented, but I also know I can 
> > change my code a heck of a lot faster than Google ever will.
> >
> > Any thoughts?
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > Paul
> >
> >     
>
>