OpenSAML user discussion

[Chad La Joie <>]

Yeah, probably should.

Scott Cantor wrote:
> > Ok. So now Google is telling me to drop the milliseconds part of
> > timestamps used in the SAML Response. I don't see an easy way to
> > accomplish that short of mucking with each individual class. Obviously the
> > spec allows milliseconds to be presented, but I also know I can change my
> > code a heck of a lot faster than Google ever will.
> >
> > Any thoughts?
>
> I remember having to patch my Java code to handle the values with or without
> the milliseconds a long time ago. It gets rather tiring being expected to
> patch our code when nobody else seems to bother.
>
> That said, I would suggest that the Java code centralize the date/time
> formatter to a place it can be modified in one spot anyway, perhaps at
> configuration time.
>
> -- Scott

--
Chad La Joie             2052-C Harris Bldg
OIS-Middleware           202.687.0124