mace-opensaml-users - RE: More Google Fun
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: "Scott Cantor" <>
- To: <>
- Subject: RE: More Google Fun
- Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 20:38:57 -0400
> Ok. So now Google is telling me to drop the milliseconds part of
> timestamps used in the SAML Response. I don't see an easy way to
> accomplish that short of mucking with each individual class. Obviously the
> spec allows milliseconds to be presented, but I also know I can change my
> code a heck of a lot faster than Google ever will.
>
> Any thoughts?
I remember having to patch my Java code to handle the values with or without
the milliseconds a long time ago. It gets rather tiring being expected to
patch our code when nobody else seems to bother.
That said, I would suggest that the Java code centralize the date/time
formatter to a place it can be modified in one spot anyway, perhaps at
configuration time.
-- Scott
- More Google Fun, Paul Hethmon, 08/07/2007
- Re: More Google Fun, Chad La Joie, 08/07/2007
- RE: More Google Fun, Paul Hethmon, 08/07/2007
- Re: More Google Fun, Bradley Beddoes, 08/07/2007
- RE: More Google Fun, Paul Hethmon, 08/08/2007
- RE: More Google Fun, Paul Hethmon, 08/07/2007
- RE: More Google Fun, Scott Cantor, 08/07/2007
- Message not available
- Re: More Google Fun, Chad La Joie, 08/07/2007
- Re: More Google Fun, Chad La Joie, 08/08/2007
- Re: More Google Fun, Tom Scavo, 08/08/2007
- Re: More Google Fun, Chad La Joie, 08/08/2007
- Re: More Google Fun, Tom Scavo, 08/08/2007
- Re: More Google Fun, Chad La Joie, 08/09/2007
- Re: More Google Fun, Chad La Joie, 08/08/2007
- RE: More Google Fun, Paul Hethmon, 08/08/2007
- Re: More Google Fun, Tom Scavo, 08/08/2007
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: More Google Fun, Paul Hethmon, 08/07/2007
- Re: More Google Fun, Chad La Joie, 08/07/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.