OpenSAML user discussion

[Chad La Joie <>]

No, afraid not.

It's unfortunate that they have such a poor SAML implementation.

Paul Hethmon wrote:
> Ok. So now Google is telling me to drop the milliseconds part of 
> timestamps used in the SAML Response. I don't see an easy way to 
> accomplish that short of mucking with each individual class. Obviously 
> the spec allows milliseconds to be presented, but I also know I can 
> change my code a heck of a lot faster than Google ever will.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> thanks,
>
> Paul

--
Chad La Joie             2052-C Harris Bldg
OIS-Middleware           202.687.0124