OpenSAML user discussion

["Paul Hethmon" <>]

You know, I pretty well figured that was the answer, but thought it worth 
asking.

I'll change my copy, build and give it a try and let everyone know the 
outcome.

thanks,

Paul



-----Original Message-----
From: Chad La Joie 
[mailto:]
Sent: Tue 8/7/2007 8:38 PM
To: 

Subject: Re: More Google Fun
 
No, afraid not.

It's unfortunate that they have such a poor SAML implementation.

Paul Hethmon wrote:
> Ok. So now Google is telling me to drop the milliseconds part of 
> timestamps used in the SAML Response. I don't see an easy way to 
> accomplish that short of mucking with each individual class. Obviously 
> the spec allows milliseconds to be presented, but I also know I can 
> change my code a heck of a lot faster than Google ever will.
> 
> Any thoughts?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> Paul
> 

-- 
Chad La Joie             2052-C Harris Bldg
OIS-Middleware           202.687.0124

<<winmail.dat>>