grouper-users - Re: [grouper-users] SCIM support for Grouper?
Subject: Grouper Users - Open Discussion List
List archive
- From: Keith Hazelton <>
- To: David Langenberg <>
- Cc: Niels van Dijk <>, ,
- Subject: Re: [grouper-users] SCIM support for Grouper?
- Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 11:50:19 -0500
- Authentication-results: sfpop-ironport03.merit.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
The CIFER Provisioning and Integration team is very interested in SCIM-based
approaches. We'll be doing some testing and will stay involved in
discussions about support for SCIM in Grouper.
--Keith
_____________
On 2013-03-18, at 11:47 , David Langenberg wrote:
> Hi Neils,
>
> Right now we're in the exploratory phase for what SCIM would look like
> within Grouper. Would we, for instance replace the SPML in the PSP with
> SCIM or just make a module that would do basically SPML -> SCIM ->
> downstream consumer.
>
> This is being presently tracked at
> https://bugs.internet2.edu/jira/browse/GRP-885
>
> As we have not established a clear goal for SCIM we do not yet have any
> timeline around implementation.
>
> Dave
>
> --
> David Langenberg
> Identity & Access Management
> The University of Chicago
>
>
>
>
> On Mar 18, 2013, at 10:36 AM, Niels van Dijk
> <>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was wondering if Grouper roadmap has SCIM on it.
>>
>> We have a use case where we are using SCIM to provision group info to a
>> cloud provisioning broker who then provisions various other clouds
>> services via none-standard APIs. Until now this was mostly test cases
>> (SCIM functionality outside of Grouper), now we would like to look at
>> doing this for 'real'.
>> As our groups already live in Grouper, and Grouper already has
>> capabilities e.g. to determine the difference between group memberships
>> between date A and date B, this seems like a good fit, I think.
>>
>> I note that last years I2 Spring Meeting had some discussions [1] and in
>> 2011 a MACE-Dir discussion [2] addressed a lot of issues that by now
>> have been solved I think. Neither however have a clear direction for
>> SCIM in regards to Grouper.
>>
>> If it is on the roadmap, are there any timeliness? If not, what ways
>> would there be to accelerate this? We have coding capabilities, but
>> coding an entire new API out of the blue is probably not a good idea ;)
>>
>> Any thoughts?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Niels
>>
>>
>> [1]
>> https://spaces.internet2.edu/display/Grouper/Grouper+Face+to+Face+Meeting+23-Apr-2012
>> [2]
>> http://middleware.internet2.edu/dir/minutes/MACE-Dir-15-August-2011.html
>
- [grouper-users] SCIM support for Grouper?, Niels van Dijk, 03/18/2013
- Re: [grouper-users] SCIM support for Grouper?, David Langenberg, 03/18/2013
- Re: [grouper-users] SCIM support for Grouper?, Keith Hazelton, 03/18/2013
- Re: [grouper-users] SCIM support for Grouper?, Tom Barton, 03/18/2013
- Re: [grouper-users] SCIM support for Grouper?, Niels van Dijk, 03/19/2013
- Re: [grouper-users] SCIM support for Grouper?, Tom Barton, 03/19/2013
- Re: [grouper-users] SCIM support for Grouper?, Emily Eisbruch, 03/19/2013
- Re: [grouper-users] SCIM support for Grouper?, Bas Zoetekouw, 03/20/2013
- Re: [grouper-users] SCIM support for Grouper?, Emily Eisbruch, 03/19/2013
- Re: [grouper-users] SCIM support for Grouper?, Tom Barton, 03/19/2013
- Re: [grouper-users] SCIM support for Grouper?, Niels van Dijk, 03/19/2013
- Re: [grouper-users] SCIM support for Grouper?, David Langenberg, 03/18/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.