grouper-users - Re: [grouper-users] Grouper and OpenJDK?
Subject: Grouper Users - Open Discussion List
List archive
- From: Scott Koranda <>
- To: "GW Brown, Information Systems and Computing" <>
- Cc: Chris Hyzer <>,
- Subject: Re: [grouper-users] Grouper and OpenJDK?
- Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 17:12:07 -0500
Hi,
> There has been a UI issue with Java 1.6 - reported by at least two people.
> An error occurred when clicking on a 'is direct member' link:
> '/WEB-INF/jsp/subjectHasPrivilegeView.jsp': Cannot find bean params in
> any scope.
>
> I've just tried reproducing that with my build of 1.3.1 using an old and a
> new Java 1.6 version - but can't.
>
> Scott: I would assume that OpenJDK 1.6 will work - and if you find there
> is
> a UI problem we'll work with you to resolve it
For the record/archives...
I am working on Cent OS 5.2 with this specific JVM:
[root@oregano
~]# rpm -qa | grep java-1.6.0
java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel-1.6.0.0-0.20.b11.el5.x86_64
java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-0.20.b11.el5.x86_64
I am using Grouper 1.3.0 and I cannot reproduce (so far) this
bug.
I *think* am exercising the same code...I am clicking on a
link next to a subject name. The link reads "is a direct
member".
I can click on that link without problems (so far).
Thanks,
Scott
>
> Gary
>
> --On 26 August 2008 11:55 -0400 Chris Hyzer
> <>
> wrote:
>
> > Gary, doesn't grouper or grouper-ui have issues with java 1.6? I
> > couldn't find a jira issue about this, if it is still a problem should we
> > add a jira issue (if its not already there)?
> >
> > I have no qualms, especially if the unit tests work ("ant test"), and if
> > the UI works :)
> >
> > In the meantime (and depending on Gary's response), Java 1.5 is a safer
> > bet.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Chris
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Scott Koranda
> >> [mailto:]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 11:33 AM
> >> To:
> >>
> >> Subject: [grouper-users] Grouper and OpenJDK?
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Has anyone tried using Grouper on top of the OpenJDK that
> >> comes with Cent OS 5?
> >>
> >> [root@oregano
> >> ~]# java -version
> >> java version "1.6.0_0"
> >> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_0-b11)
> >> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 1.6.0_0-b11, mixed mode)
> >>
> >> Do the Grouper developers have any qualms about deploying
> >> Grouper on top of the JVM?
> >>
> >> I am trying to make the deployment of Grouper for our
> >> organization as simple as possible and part of that is trying
> >> to leverage software that can easily be installed on the
> >> system using native packaging.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Scott
>
>
>
> ----------------------
> GW Brown, Information Systems and Computing
>
>
- Grouper and OpenJDK?, Scott Koranda, 08/26/2008
- RE: [grouper-users] Grouper and OpenJDK?, Chris Hyzer, 08/26/2008
- RE: [grouper-users] Grouper and OpenJDK?, GW Brown, Information Systems and Computing, 08/27/2008
- RE: [grouper-users] Grouper and OpenJDK?, GW Brown, Information Systems and Computing, 08/27/2008
- Re: [grouper-users] Grouper and OpenJDK?, Scott Koranda, 08/27/2008
- Re: [grouper-users] Grouper and OpenJDK?, GW Brown, Information Systems and Computing, 08/28/2008
- Re: [grouper-users] Grouper and OpenJDK?, Scott Koranda, 08/27/2008
- Re: [grouper-users] Grouper and OpenJDK?, Scott Koranda, 08/27/2008
- RE: [grouper-users] Grouper and OpenJDK?, GW Brown, Information Systems and Computing, 08/27/2008
- RE: [grouper-users] Grouper and OpenJDK?, GW Brown, Information Systems and Computing, 08/27/2008
- RE: [grouper-users] Grouper and OpenJDK?, Chris Hyzer, 08/26/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.