Grouper Users - Open Discussion List

["GW Brown, Information Systems and Computing" <>]

--On 27 August 2008 17:18 -0500 Scott Koranda 
<> wrote:

> >  I've hopefully fixed the issue in the 1.3.1 branch.
> >
> >  subjectHasPrivilegeView.jsp depended on params and privMap being passed
> >  from  a higher level tile. This was not working for some reason with
> >  JDK 1.6 which  used to give an error. The error stopped happening with
> >  v1.6 of  subjectHasPrivilegeView.jsp as a jsp:useBean tag ensured
> >  params was always  available - if empty, however, it did not address
> >  the underlying problem.
> >
> >  I have worked around the issue - params -> linkParams and privMap is
> >  now  shifted to the SubjectAsMap instance that is passed. This works
> >  for JDK 1.5  and 1.6.
> >
> >  I don't know what was going on. There seems to be an issue passing some
> >  attributes to a dynamic tile but if there is a systemic problem I would
> >  have  expected to have problems elsewhere.
>
> Thanks. Again, I cannot seem to reproduce the problem with the
> JDK 1.6 I am using
> (java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-0.20.b11.el5.x86_64). I may not,
> however, be properly exercising the code where the bug may or
> may not live.
>
> Still, I will take a version 1.3.1 if I can get it (we are not
> in production yet).
>
> When would you expect to release version 1.3.1?
1.3.1 is due soon - we hope to have a release candidate by the end of next 
week.
> Cheers,
>
> Scott
>
> >  Gary
> >
> >  --On 27 August 2008 13:24 +0100 "GW Brown, Information Systems and
> >  Computing" 
> > <>
> >  wrote:
> >
> > > There has been a UI issue with Java 1.6 - reported by at least two
> > > people. An error occurred when clicking on a 'is direct member' link:
> > > '/WEB-INF/jsp/subjectHasPrivilegeView.jsp': Cannot find bean params in
> > > any scope.
> > >
> > > I've just tried reproducing that with my build of 1.3.1 using an old
> > > and a new Java 1.6 version - but can't.
> > >
> > > Scott: I would assume that OpenJDK 1.6 will work - and if you find
> > > there is a UI problem we'll work with you to resolve it
> > >
> > > Gary
> > >
> > > --On 26 August 2008 11:55 -0400 Chris Hyzer 
> > <>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Gary, doesn't grouper or grouper-ui have issues with java 1.6?  I
> > >> couldn't find a jira issue about this, if it is still a problem
> > >> should we add a jira issue (if its not already there)?
> > >>
> > >> I have no qualms, especially if the unit tests work ("ant test"), and
> > >> if the UI works :)
> > >>
> > >> In the meantime (and depending on Gary's response), Java 1.5 is a
> > >> safer bet.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks
> > >> Chris
> > >>
> > >>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>> From: Scott Koranda 
> > [mailto:]
> > >>> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 11:33 AM
> > >>> To: 
> >
> > >>> Subject: [grouper-users] Grouper and OpenJDK?
> > >>>
> > >>> Hi,
> > >>>
> > >>> Has anyone tried using Grouper on top of the OpenJDK that
> > >>> comes with Cent OS 5?
> > >>>
> > >>> 
> > [root@oregano
> >  ~]# java -version
> > >>> java version "1.6.0_0"
> > >>> OpenJDK  Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_0-b11)
> > >>> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 1.6.0_0-b11, mixed mode)
> > >>>
> > >>> Do the Grouper developers have any qualms about deploying
> > >>> Grouper on top of the JVM?
> > >>>
> > >>> I am trying to make the deployment of Grouper for our
> > >>> organization as simple as possible and part of that is trying
> > >>> to leverage software that can easily be installed on the
> > >>> system using native packaging.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>>
> > >>> Scott
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----------------------
> > > GW Brown, Information Systems and Computing
> > > 
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  ----------------------
> >  GW Brown, Information Systems and Computing
> >  



----------------------
GW Brown, Information Systems and Computing