Grouper Users - Open Discussion List

[Scott Koranda <>]

>  I've hopefully fixed the issue in the 1.3.1 branch.
> 
>  subjectHasPrivilegeView.jsp depended on params and privMap being passed 
> from 
>  a higher level tile. This was not working for some reason with JDK 1.6 
> which 
>  used to give an error. The error stopped happening with v1.6 of 
>  subjectHasPrivilegeView.jsp as a jsp:useBean tag ensured params was always 
>  available - if empty, however, it did not address the underlying problem.
> 
>  I have worked around the issue - params -> linkParams and privMap is now 
>  shifted to the SubjectAsMap instance that is passed. This works for JDK 
> 1.5 
>  and 1.6.
> 
>  I don't know what was going on. There seems to be an issue passing some 
>  attributes to a dynamic tile but if there is a systemic problem I would 
> have 
>  expected to have problems elsewhere.

Thanks. Again, I cannot seem to reproduce the problem with the
JDK 1.6 I am using
(java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-0.20.b11.el5.x86_64). I may not,
however, be properly exercising the code where the bug may or
may not live.

Still, I will take a version 1.3.1 if I can get it (we are not
in production yet).

When would you expect to release version 1.3.1?

Cheers,

Scott

> 
>  Gary
> 
>  --On 27 August 2008 13:24 +0100 "GW Brown, Information Systems and 
>  Computing" 
> <>
>  wrote:
> 
> > There has been a UI issue with Java 1.6 - reported by at least two
> > people. An error occurred when clicking on a 'is direct member' link:
> > '/WEB-INF/jsp/subjectHasPrivilegeView.jsp': Cannot find bean params in
> > any scope.
> >
> > I've just tried reproducing that with my build of 1.3.1 using an old and
> > a new Java 1.6 version - but can't.
> >
> > Scott: I would assume that OpenJDK 1.6 will work - and if you find there
> > is a UI problem we'll work with you to resolve it
> >
> > Gary
> >
> > --On 26 August 2008 11:55 -0400 Chris Hyzer 
> > <>
> >  wrote:
> >
> >> Gary, doesn't grouper or grouper-ui have issues with java 1.6?  I
> >> couldn't find a jira issue about this, if it is still a problem should we
> >> add a jira issue (if its not already there)?
> >>
> >> I have no qualms, especially if the unit tests work ("ant test"), and if
> >> the UI works :)
> >>
> >> In the meantime (and depending on Gary's response), Java 1.5 is a safer
> >> bet.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Chris
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Scott Koranda 
> >>> [mailto:]
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 11:33 AM
> >>> To: 
> >>> 
> >>> Subject: [grouper-users] Grouper and OpenJDK?
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Has anyone tried using Grouper on top of the OpenJDK that
> >>> comes with Cent OS 5?
> >>>
> >>> [root@oregano
> >>>  ~]# java -version
> >>> java version "1.6.0_0"
> >>> OpenJDK  Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_0-b11)
> >>> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 1.6.0_0-b11, mixed mode)
> >>>
> >>> Do the Grouper developers have any qualms about deploying
> >>> Grouper on top of the JVM?
> >>>
> >>> I am trying to make the deployment of Grouper for our
> >>> organization as simple as possible and part of that is trying
> >>> to leverage software that can easily be installed on the
> >>> system using native packaging.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> Scott
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------
> > GW Brown, Information Systems and Computing
> > 
> 
> 
> 
>  ----------------------
>  GW Brown, Information Systems and Computing
>  
>