Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

grouper-dev - Re: [grouper-dev] grouper-uportal : grouperClient and central repo

Subject: Grouper Developers Forum

List archive

Re: [grouper-dev] grouper-uportal : grouperClient and central repo


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Tom Zeller <>
  • To: Grouper Dev <>
  • Subject: Re: [grouper-dev] grouper-uportal : grouperClient and central repo
  • Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 09:53:15 -0500
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=S9yD3UbkKBkow6eB0uCaFe1f44KUDnvfRQ9DGRmeECYM3mPyb0ZT3Wm3XmyHRxrMTO uaIHQbfpNI17IDQr93/T8j3EwdcYqjKSqmXO+yuhRtzuqla9uzM2DvmTfzvfItm62g9z dsO7nG+VlbXhuGD1lkL8C6viCu404oUdTRDr0=

FYI I went ahead and filled out the forms to request a repository from
oss.sonatype.org which will sync to apache.org, should take a day or
two to get that setup.

https://issues.sonatype.org/browse/OSSRH-486

On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Tom Zeller
<>
wrote:
> Regarding potential license issues, I thought that sonatype.com or
> apache.org might have specific licensing requirements that we and all
> of our dependencies would need to satisfy. After reading more, I don't
> see anything of concern. Of course, we can't bundle jars that lack the
> appropriate license anyway, but we might be held to that restriction.
>
>> Tom,
>>
>> What potential license issues might there be?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Tom
>>
>> Tom Zeller wrote:
>>>
>>> Apparently there is a need to provide grouperClient from a central
>>> maven repository in order for a uPortal integration to happen. I've
>>> received information on how to go about this process, namely :
>>>
>>> https://docs.sonatype.com/display/NX/OSS+Repository+Hosting
>>>
>>> In summary, we deploy to this "forge" which then syncs to the central
>>> maven repo.
>>>
>>> If folks agree and so desire, I (or someone else ?) can make this
>>> happen or at least gather more information. I don't have all of the
>>> details right now, but before I spend any more time I thought I would
>>> poll for consensus.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> TomZ
>>>
>>> P.S. I imagine there might be license issues that we need to be aware
>>> of and understand.
>>
>>
>>
>



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page