Grouper Developers Forum

[Tom Barton <>]

We can do it along with the rest of the uPortal work, after 1.6.0.

Tom

Tom Zeller wrote:
> It looks like properly mavenizing grouperClient for deployment to a
> central repository for use by uPortal will be a bit of reverse
> engineering work, which should probably wait until after we release
> 1.6.0 - or is there some other timeline that needs to be met ?
>
> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Tom Zeller 
> <>
>  wrote:
> > FYI I went ahead and filled out the forms to request a repository from
> > oss.sonatype.org which will sync to apache.org, should take a day or
> > two to get that setup.
> >
> > https://issues.sonatype.org/browse/OSSRH-486
> >
> > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Tom Zeller 
> > <>
> >  wrote:
> > > Regarding potential license issues, I thought that sonatype.com or
> > > apache.org might have specific licensing requirements that we and all
> > > of our dependencies would need to satisfy. After reading more, I don't
> > > see anything of concern. Of course, we can't bundle jars that lack the
> > > appropriate license anyway, but we might be held to that restriction.
> > >
> > > > Tom,
> > > >
> > > > What potential license issues might there be?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Tom
> > > >
> > > > Tom Zeller wrote:
> > > > > Apparently there is a need to provide grouperClient from a central
> > > > > maven repository in order for a uPortal integration to happen. I've
> > > > > received information on how to go about this process, namely :
> > > > >
> > > > > https://docs.sonatype.com/display/NX/OSS+Repository+Hosting
> > > > >
> > > > > In summary, we deploy to this "forge" which then syncs to the central
> > > > > maven repo.
> > > > >
> > > > > If folks agree and so desire, I (or someone else ?) can make this
> > > > > happen or at least gather more information. I don't have all of the
> > > > > details right now, but before I spend any more time I thought I would
> > > > > poll for consensus.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > TomZ
> > > > >
> > > > > P.S. I imagine there might be license issues that we need to be aware
> > > > > of and understand.