Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

grouper-dev - Re: [grouper-dev] grouper-uportal : grouperClient and central repo

Subject: Grouper Developers Forum

List archive

Re: [grouper-dev] grouper-uportal : grouperClient and central repo

Chronological Thread 
  • From: Tom Zeller <>
  • To: Tom Barton <>
  • Cc: Grouper Dev <>
  • Subject: Re: [grouper-dev] grouper-uportal : grouperClient and central repo
  • Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 17:44:21 -0500
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; b=syLKu7k2fK2FXy6quDuO2kAZ3kAzR7DipCt++aO4aLv0CKMa/caKReUj0psY+VMlhj G0XDgSyOvmG9zhn8AHZcYnfNh/KnrqmZQsZVFpVu3msRoFw90XvAtxSCDV+XyMMt0RUo hr337wP57Qca624pfMq8AQMWRqckUVlxU7mr8=

Regarding potential license issues, I thought that or might have specific licensing requirements that we and all
of our dependencies would need to satisfy. After reading more, I don't
see anything of concern. Of course, we can't bundle jars that lack the
appropriate license anyway, but we might be held to that restriction.

> Tom,
> What potential license issues might there be?
> Thanks,
> Tom
> Tom Zeller wrote:
>> Apparently there is a need to provide grouperClient from a central
>> maven repository in order for a uPortal integration to happen. I've
>> received information on how to go about this process, namely :
>> In summary, we deploy to this "forge" which then syncs to the central
>> maven repo.
>> If folks agree and so desire, I (or someone else ?) can make this
>> happen or at least gather more information. I don't have all of the
>> details right now, but before I spend any more time I thought I would
>> poll for consensus.
>> Thanks,
>> TomZ
>> P.S. I imagine there might be license issues that we need to be aware
>> of and understand.

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page