wg-pic - Re: [wg-pic] Client requirements
Subject: Presence and IntComm WG
List archive
- From: Ben Teitelbaum <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [wg-pic] Client requirements
- Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 15:57:20 -0400
I'll repeat my oft-asked question:
Is anyone aware of an iLBC - G.711 media gateway that we could use?
-- ben
Jiri Kuthan
<>
writes:
> At 04:29 AM 7/1/2004, Xiaotao Wu wrote:
>>On Fri, 25 Jun 2004, Rork, Joseph (J.P.) wrote:
>>
>>> One topic that we didn't get a chance to talk about on yesterday's call
>>> was the additional items that need to be appended to the current client
>>> requirements documents. (push-to-talk, iLBC, etc) I'm looking for
>>
>>For iLBC requirement, I think it will be just one line to mention the
>>clients SHOULD support iLBC codec.
>
> absolutely, except I would favor s/SHOULD/MUST.
>
>> Should we by default use iLBC?
>
> yes.
>
> -jiri
- Re: [wg-pic] Client requirements, Jiri Kuthan, 07/01/2004
- Re: [wg-pic] Client requirements, Ben Teitelbaum, 07/01/2004
- Re: [wg-pic] Client requirements, Jiri Kuthan, 07/01/2004
- Re: [wg-pic] Client requirements, Dennis Baron, 07/02/2004
- Re: [wg-pic] Client requirements, Xiaotao Wu, 07/02/2004
- Re: [wg-pic] Client requirements, Steve Blair, 07/02/2004
- Re: [wg-pic] Client requirements, Jiri Kuthan, 07/02/2004
- Re: [wg-pic] Client requirements, Steve Blair, 07/02/2004
- Re: [wg-pic] Client requirements, Ben Teitelbaum, 07/02/2004
- Re: [wg-pic] Client requirements, Jiri Kuthan, 07/02/2004
- Re: [wg-pic] Client requirements, Ben Teitelbaum, 07/02/2004
- Re: [wg-pic] Client requirements, Jiri Kuthan, 07/02/2004
- Re: [wg-pic] Client requirements, Xiaotao Wu, 07/02/2004
- Re: [wg-pic] Client requirements, Dennis Baron, 07/02/2004
- Re: [wg-pic] Client requirements, Jamey Hicks, 07/02/2004
- Re: [wg-pic] Client requirements, Jiri Kuthan, 07/01/2004
- Re: [wg-pic] Client requirements, Ben Teitelbaum, 07/01/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.