wg-pic - Re: [wg-pic] Client requirements
Subject: Presence and IntComm WG
List archive
- From: Jiri Kuthan <>
- To: , <>
- Subject: Re: [wg-pic] Client requirements
- Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 17:07:22 +0200
At 04:29 AM 7/1/2004, Xiaotao Wu wrote:
>On Fri, 25 Jun 2004, Rork, Joseph (J.P.) wrote:
>
>> One topic that we didn't get a chance to talk about on yesterday's call
>> was the additional items that need to be appended to the current client
>> requirements documents. (push-to-talk, iLBC, etc) I'm looking for
>
>For iLBC requirement, I think it will be just one line to mention the
>clients SHOULD support iLBC codec.
absolutely, except I would favor s/SHOULD/MUST.
> Should we by default use iLBC?
yes.
-jiri
- Re: [wg-pic] Client requirements, Jiri Kuthan, 07/01/2004
- Re: [wg-pic] Client requirements, Ben Teitelbaum, 07/01/2004
- Re: [wg-pic] Client requirements, Jiri Kuthan, 07/01/2004
- Re: [wg-pic] Client requirements, Dennis Baron, 07/02/2004
- Re: [wg-pic] Client requirements, Xiaotao Wu, 07/02/2004
- Re: [wg-pic] Client requirements, Steve Blair, 07/02/2004
- Re: [wg-pic] Client requirements, Jiri Kuthan, 07/02/2004
- Re: [wg-pic] Client requirements, Steve Blair, 07/02/2004
- Re: [wg-pic] Client requirements, Ben Teitelbaum, 07/02/2004
- Re: [wg-pic] Client requirements, Jiri Kuthan, 07/02/2004
- Re: [wg-pic] Client requirements, Ben Teitelbaum, 07/02/2004
- Re: [wg-pic] Client requirements, Jiri Kuthan, 07/02/2004
- Re: [wg-pic] Client requirements, Xiaotao Wu, 07/02/2004
- Re: [wg-pic] Client requirements, Dennis Baron, 07/02/2004
- Re: [wg-pic] Client requirements, Jamey Hicks, 07/02/2004
- Re: [wg-pic] Client requirements, Jiri Kuthan, 07/01/2004
- Re: [wg-pic] Client requirements, Ben Teitelbaum, 07/01/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.