All things related to multicast

[Bill Owens <>]

Good point, but unless that list is very quiet I'm not on it. if I could be 
added I will start a thread there.  

Thanks, 
Bill. 

On Jan 4, 2013, at 10:37, "Michael H Lambert" 
<>
 wrote:

> On 4 Jan 2013, at 10:24, Jeff Bartig wrote:
> 
>> I'm curious what type of maintenance on the NLR Atlanta node could
>> have caused a full table leak.  Do the NLR routers carry a full table?
>> Is one of their peers in Atlanta accidentally sending a full table
>> that is normally filtered and the maintenance broke the filtering?
> 
> Very good questions.  Perhaps some more details will trickle out.
> 
> In the meantime, wearing NTAC vice-chair hat (David can overrule if he's 
> reading mail yet this morning), I'd like to ask someone (Bill, you started 
> the thread) to post a summary to the peering/routing WG list so that we can 
> continue discussions there.  I haven't seen anything to suggest this 
> problem was multicast related--the proper audience is more likely to be on 
> ntacpeering.  If you're not on that list, and would like to be, Jeff 
> (cc'ed) can get you added.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Michael
> 
>