All things related to multicast

[Katsuhiro Horiba <>]

Thank you for your comments.

I agree to use GLOP address.
I'm sorry, of course I don't want to rake over typo.
I just want know the global consensus about IPv4 multicast addressing.

Again, thank you for your comments.

Katsuhiro Horiba

On 2009/07/23, at 22:19, Stig Venaas wrote:

> Katsuhiro Horiba wrote:
> > Hi, Bill and Cort,
> > I think your mail is very interesting.
> > I choose the group address depends on the GLOP rules.
> > (We are AS2500, 233.9.196.0/24 was calculated by GLOP.)
> > I'm interesting how do you choose the IPv4 group address when you  
> > want to send Multicast traffic?
> > Do you have any policy in the Internet2 community, Global Multicast  
> > community's agreement or MSDP filter rules?
>
> I think there was just some confusion with the typo below. IMO GLOP
> addresses are the best choice for Internet multicast like this. Mainly
> since there should be no conflict.
>
> Stig
>
> > Best Regards,
> > Katsuhiro Horiba
> > On 2009/07/23, at 0:36, Cort Buffington wrote:
> > > Thank you Bill! Brother Owens wins the prize... I had mad a typo  
> > > transcribing the groups from Katsuhiro's original e-mail as  
> > > 239.9....
> > >
> > > So it looks like I'm the fool wasting time :)
> > >
> > > On Jul 22, 2009, at 10:14 AM, Bill Owens wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:04:09AM -0500, Cort Buffington wrote:
> > > > > Am I the only one that blocks administratively scoped multicast  
> > > > > group
> > > > > addresses at my autonomous system border?
> > > >
> > > > Most people do (including NYSERNet). But what does that have to  
> > > > do with this multicast?
> > > >
> > > > Bill.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Cort Buffington
> > > Executive Director
> > > The Kansas Research and Education Network
> > >
> > > Office: +1-785-856-9800 x301
> > > Mobile: +1-785-865-7206

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature