wg-multicast - Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?
Subject: All things related to multicast
List archive
- From: "Marshall Eubanks" <>
- To: Greg Shepherd <>, Chris Rapier <>
- Cc: wg-multicast <>
- Subject: Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?
- Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 13:53:42 -0400
Boy, you get busy for a day or so and all sorts of stuff happens.
On Fri, 14 May 2004 08:19:24 -0700 (PDT)
Greg Shepherd
<>
wrote:
>
> http://www.onthei.com
>
Thanks - but better stuff is available from
http://www.americafree.tv
I feel like saying I use multicast all the time - what's the problem ?
(Well, inter-domain ASM will die soon if nothing is done, but
when you are free from or isolated from SA storms, it
actually works surprisingly well.)
I think that multicast is being used more, and will become part of the
"hidden" infrastructure of the Internet but I think that the community (the
people reading this email) do not have the power to push through general
multicast.
That will happen, if it ever does, by pull (demand), not push.
For a different view on this, see
http://www.americasnetwork.com/americasnetwork/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=93874
However, another way to approach the problem is to concentrate on new
areas - and I think that wireless Internet access (which I bet is what most
of us actually us much of the time to access the Internet) holds promise for
driving
through cheap Internet broadcast, probably through some combination
of native and application layer multicast.
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
> Greg
>
> > application isn't the DJ stuff though. Its building a 'radio' application
> > that
> > doesn't suck and is appealing to the kids (especially the collegiate
> > linux kids)
> > (and before anyone says "Vic and Vat already exist" - they aren't good
> > enough -
> > protocol maybe, interface no way). If the kids adopt this in college and
> > start
> > to really want it the pressure they exert on the market as they enter the
> > real
> > world will push more ISPs to offer multicast.
> >
> > At that point things like conference calls, video streaming, and new
> > applications will start to be adopted by the wider market and we'll see
> > some
> > real progress.
> >
> > Just my thoughts on it.
> >
> >
>
- Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, (continued)
- Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Marshall Eubanks, 05/17/2004
- Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Hugh LaMaster, 05/13/2004
- Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Bob Riddle, 05/14/2004
- Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, René Hatem, 05/13/2004
- Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Leonard Giuliano, 05/13/2004
- Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Chris Rapier, 05/14/2004
- Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Chris Rapier, 05/14/2004
- Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Greg Shepherd, 05/14/2004
- Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Chris Rapier, 05/14/2004
- Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Joel Jaeggli, 05/14/2004
- Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Marshall Eubanks, 05/14/2004
- Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Chris Rapier, 05/14/2004
- Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Chris Rapier, 05/14/2004
- Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Bob Riddle, 05/14/2004
- Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Brent Sweeny, 05/14/2004
- Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, William F. Maton, 05/14/2004
- Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Dan Hague, 05/16/2004
- Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Greg Shepherd, 05/13/2004
- RE: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Richard Mavrogeanes, 05/13/2004
- RE: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Kevin C. Almeroth, 05/14/2004
- Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Bob Riddle, 05/14/2004
- Why don't we use multicast more often?, John Watters, 05/14/2004
- RE: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Paul Gilbert, 05/14/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.