wg-multicast - RE: multicast address (mis)use or just another bizarro?
Subject: All things related to multicast
List archive
- From: Mike McBride <>
- To: Richard Mavrogeanes <>
- Cc: ,
- Subject: RE: multicast address (mis)use or just another bizarro?
- Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 09:42:04 -0700 (PDT)
draft-ietf-mboned-ipv4-mcast-unusable-01.txt lists Altiris among the group
of addresses that need to be filtered.
mike
On Thu, 13 May 2004, Richard Mavrogeanes wrote:
> Altiris (http://www.altiris.com/products/), like many products, use
> multicast but they expect to use it locally, I think.
>
> I should think a non-GLOP address might be a candidate for filtering, at
> least from I2.
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: William F. Maton
> [mailto:]
> Sent: Thu 5/13/2004 7:05 PM
> To:
>
> Cc:
> Subject: multicast address (mis)use or just another bizarro?
>
>
>
>
> Greetings,
>
> I remember there was a topic at some point on the use of
> certain
> multicast addresses by certain vendors for their respective
> applications
> without any real thought to consulting anyone first.
>
> Well, I started getting annoyed at my little Compaq for
> taking so
> long to compile ... some stuff. Anyways, I went in seek, locate and
> exterminate mode at lo-and-behold, I found an annoying little icon on
> my
> Windows XP box calling itself Altiris. (Beats me.)
>
> It seems that the Altiris client has been programmed by
> default
> (but can be changed) to use a multicast address, 225.1.2.3. Is this
> one a
> candidate for MSDP filtering?
>
> wfms
>
>
- multicast address (mis)use or just another bizarro?, William F. Maton, 05/13/2004
- Re: multicast address (mis)use or just another bizarro?, Michael H. Lambert, 05/13/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: multicast address (mis)use or just another bizarro?, Richard Mavrogeanes, 05/13/2004
- RE: multicast address (mis)use or just another bizarro?, Mike McBride, 05/14/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.