wg-multicast - Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?
Subject: All things related to multicast
List archive
- From: Joel Jaeggli <>
- To: Chris Rapier <>
- Cc: wg-multicast <>
- Subject: Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?
- Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 09:37:10 -0700 (PDT)
there's a wifi enabled multicasting boombox at nyc wireless, not that
that's relevant, I don't really think a bunch of network engineers in
their 40's are really going to have a lot of success predicting what the
next killer app for the under 20 set will be unless it invloves online
gaming, and even that's hit or miss.
On Fri, 14 May 2004, Chris Rapier wrote:
> Well, thats half of it... Though, I think a stand alone open source app is
> more
> what I'm thinking about. Something to get everyone involved in both
> directions.
> Obviously you have the royalty payment question but I'm willing to support
> a
> little illicit activity... :)
>
> Greg Shepherd wrote:
> > http://www.onthei.com
> >
> > Greg
> >
> >
> >>application isn't the DJ stuff though. Its building a 'radio' application
> >>that
> >>doesn't suck and is appealing to the kids (especially the collegiate
> >>linux kids)
> >>(and before anyone says "Vic and Vat already exist" - they aren't good
> >>enough -
> >>protocol maybe, interface no way). If the kids adopt this in college and
> >>start
> >>to really want it the pressure they exert on the market as they enter the
> >>real
> >>world will push more ISPs to offer multicast.
> >>
> >>At that point things like conference calls, video streaming, and new
> >>applications will start to be adopted by the wider market and we'll see
> >>some
> >>real progress.
> >>
> >>Just my thoughts on it.
> >>
> >>
> >
>
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Joel Jaeggli Unix Consulting
GPG Key Fingerprint: 5C6E 0104 BAF0 40B0 5BD3 C38B F000 35AB B67F 56B2
- Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, (continued)
- Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Bill Owens, 05/17/2004
- Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Marshall Eubanks, 05/17/2004
- Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Hugh LaMaster, 05/13/2004
- Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Bob Riddle, 05/14/2004
- Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, René Hatem, 05/13/2004
- Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Leonard Giuliano, 05/13/2004
- Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Chris Rapier, 05/14/2004
- Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Chris Rapier, 05/14/2004
- Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Greg Shepherd, 05/14/2004
- Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Chris Rapier, 05/14/2004
- Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Joel Jaeggli, 05/14/2004
- Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Marshall Eubanks, 05/14/2004
- Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Chris Rapier, 05/14/2004
- Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Chris Rapier, 05/14/2004
- Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Bob Riddle, 05/14/2004
- Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Brent Sweeny, 05/14/2004
- Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, William F. Maton, 05/14/2004
- Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Dan Hague, 05/16/2004
- Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Greg Shepherd, 05/13/2004
- RE: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Richard Mavrogeanes, 05/13/2004
- RE: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Kevin C. Almeroth, 05/14/2004
- Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Bob Riddle, 05/14/2004
- Why don't we use multicast more often?, John Watters, 05/14/2004
- Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Bill Owens, 05/17/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.