wg-multicast - Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?

Subject: All things related to multicast

List archive

Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?

From: Bill Owens <>
To:
Subject: Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?
Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 17:45:18 -0400

On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 02:23:17PM -0700, Greg Shepherd wrote:
>
> Conferencing has been repeatedly miss-identified as an "ideal" multicast
> application. It is not.

Why not?

Bill.

Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, (continued)
- RE: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Richard Mavrogeanes, 05/13/2004
  - Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Bill Owens, 05/13/2004
    - Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Greg Shepherd, 05/13/2004
      - Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, John Zwiebel, 05/13/2004
      - Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Bill Owens, 05/13/2004
        
        Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, John Zwiebel, 05/13/2004
        
        Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Bob Riddle, 05/14/2004
        
        Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Greg Shepherd, 05/13/2004
        
        Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Bill Owens, 05/17/2004
        
        Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Marshall Eubanks, 05/17/2004
      - Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Hugh LaMaster, 05/13/2004
        
        Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Bob Riddle, 05/14/2004
    - Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, René Hatem, 05/13/2004
    - Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Leonard Giuliano, 05/13/2004
      - Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Chris Rapier, 05/14/2004

List archive

Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?