wg-multicast - Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?

Subject: All things related to multicast

List archive

Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?

From: John Zwiebel <>
To: Greg Shepherd <>
Cc: , Bill Owens <>
Subject: Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?
Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 14:29:47 -0700

On May 13, 2004, at 2:23 PM, Greg Shepherd wrote:

Conferencing has been repeatedly miss-identified as an "ideal" multicast
application. It is not. And acutally, much of the baggage we have today
with ASM came from that miss-targeted application.

Greg

Its nice to be able to agree with you right at this moment. :-)

Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, (continued)
- RE: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Richard Mavrogeanes, 05/13/2004
  - Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Bill Owens, 05/13/2004
    - Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Greg Shepherd, 05/13/2004
      - Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, John Zwiebel, 05/13/2004
      - Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Bill Owens, 05/13/2004
        
        Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, John Zwiebel, 05/13/2004
        
        Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Bob Riddle, 05/14/2004
        
        Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Greg Shepherd, 05/13/2004
        
        Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Bill Owens, 05/17/2004
        
        Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Marshall Eubanks, 05/17/2004
      - Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Hugh LaMaster, 05/13/2004
        
        Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Bob Riddle, 05/14/2004
    - Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, René Hatem, 05/13/2004
    - Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?, Leonard Giuliano, 05/13/2004

List archive

Re: Why don't we use multicast more often?