Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

wg-multicast - Re: Catalyst RGMP?

Subject: All things related to multicast

List archive

Re: Catalyst RGMP?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Toerless Eckert <>
  • To: Alan Crosswell <>
  • Cc: "Jan Novak (janovak)" <>, Peter John Hill <>,
  • Subject: Re: Catalyst RGMP?
  • Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 10:19:01 -0800

On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 12:50:05PM -0500, Alan Crosswell wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks for starting this thread. I hadn't looked into RGMP prior to
> > > your post. I had the same thoughts about IGMP snooping, I had
> > > felt that
> > > it would be of little use in the core, since everything (I think) is
> > > done with PIM.
> >
> > IGMP snooping must be turned on on the C6509 together with RGMP.
> > It is not a "protocol" requirement, but rather implementation thing.
> >
> > Jan
> >
>
> Will this then cause by dual star to hose up my group memberships?

No. This will work fine.

The only thing you may want to remember with or without IGMP is that
RGMP does not constrain traffic on the link(s) between the two switches
of your. So you should make sure that the bandwidth on these links
is high enough, if necessary with the help of etherchannel.

Cheers
Toerless




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page