wg-multicast - Re: Catalyst RGMP?
Subject: All things related to multicast
List archive
- From: Toerless Eckert <>
- To: Alan Crosswell <>
- Cc: "Jan Novak (janovak)" <>, Peter John Hill <>,
- Subject: Re: Catalyst RGMP?
- Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 10:19:01 -0800
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 12:50:05PM -0500, Alan Crosswell wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks for starting this thread. I hadn't looked into RGMP prior to
> > > your post. I had the same thoughts about IGMP snooping, I had
> > > felt that
> > > it would be of little use in the core, since everything (I think) is
> > > done with PIM.
> >
> > IGMP snooping must be turned on on the C6509 together with RGMP.
> > It is not a "protocol" requirement, but rather implementation thing.
> >
> > Jan
> >
>
> Will this then cause by dual star to hose up my group memberships?
No. This will work fine.
The only thing you may want to remember with or without IGMP is that
RGMP does not constrain traffic on the link(s) between the two switches
of your. So you should make sure that the bandwidth on these links
is high enough, if necessary with the help of etherchannel.
Cheers
Toerless
- Re: Catalyst RGMP?, (continued)
- Re: Catalyst RGMP?, Tsegreda Beyene, 11/08/2002
- Re: Catalyst RGMP?, Alan Crosswell, 11/08/2002
- Re: Catalyst RGMP?, Alan Crosswell, 11/11/2002
- Re: Catalyst RGMP?, Toerless Eckert, 11/12/2002
- Re: Catalyst RGMP?, Alan Crosswell, 11/12/2002
- Re: Catalyst RGMP?, Peter John Hill, 11/12/2002
- re: Catalyst RGMP?, Jay Ford, 11/12/2002
- Re: Catalyst RGMP?, Peter John Hill, 11/12/2002
- RE: Catalyst RGMP?, Jan Novak (janovak), 11/12/2002
- RE: Catalyst RGMP?, Tsegreda Beyene, 11/12/2002
- RE: Catalyst RGMP?, Alan Crosswell, 11/12/2002
- Re: Catalyst RGMP?, Toerless Eckert, 11/12/2002
- RE: Catalyst RGMP?, Jan Novak (janovak), 11/12/2002
- RE: Catalyst RGMP?, Alan Crosswell, 11/12/2002
- RE: Catalyst RGMP?, Tsegreda Beyene, 11/12/2002
- RE: Catalyst RGMP?, Wallace, Steven S, 11/13/2002
- Re: Catalyst RGMP?, Toerless Eckert, 11/13/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.