wg-multicast - Re: IPv6 Multicast
Subject: All things related to multicast
List archive
- From: Marshall Eubanks <>
- To: "Kevin C. Almeroth" <>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: IPv6 Multicast
- Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2002 13:14:05 -0400
An on topic post !
Kevin C. Almeroth wrote:
Well, I've been very careful not to exclude work on IPv6 ASM... just
to say that SSM is a lower hanging fruit and it will be the first place
we start.
As for the value of ASM, it certainly has a niche. The point though
is to separate ASM from MSDP and come up with some additional options.
'Cause right now, ASM using MSDP stinks. So maybe that second option
moves the source discovery functionality out of the network.
What, exactly, is the plan to make IPv6 multicast multidomain ? Will BGMP come back from the dead ? Or will MSDP-NG rear its head ?
If nothing is done, then someone will port MSDP to IPv6, and it will be
deja vu all over again.
Unless some vendor is going to jump on BGMP in a big way, I would urge that work begin immediately to make MSDP into something that will last.
Just my $ 0.02 worth.
Marshall
-Kevin
On Wed, 7 Aug 2002, Alan Crosswell wrote:
SSM is great for one-way media streaming and WWW guides probably work just
fine for that. However, there is still a small niche of ASM-oriented
apps that are not geared to a human user clicking on a web link. My fear
is that the focus on doing SSM exclusively will set these back. In fact,
the whole source discovery process is intrinsically an ASM thing which is
kludged up today with multiple-unicast (WWW and CDN's that are needed for
large site just 'cuz of the scaling issues which multicast solves).
/a
--
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
This e-mail may contain confidential and proprietary information of
Multicast Technologies, Inc, subject to Non-Disclosure Agreements
T.M. Eubanks
Multicast Technologies, Inc
10301 Democracy Lane, Suite 410
Fairfax, Virginia 22030
Phone : 703-293-9624 Fax : 703-293-9609
e-mail :
http://www.multicasttech.com
Test your network for multicast :
http://www.multicasttech.com/mt/
Status of Multicast on the Web :
http://www.multicasttech.com/status/index.html
- Re: On avoiding the need to require snooping switches, (continued)
- Re: On avoiding the need to require snooping switches, Guy T Almes, 08/12/2002
- Re: On avoiding the need to require snooping switches, Bill Nickless, 08/13/2002
- Re: IPv6 Multicast, Alan Crosswell, 08/07/2002
- Re: IPv6 Multicast, Kevin C. Almeroth, 08/07/2002
- Re: IPv6 Multicast, Alan Crosswell, 08/07/2002
- Re: IPv6 Multicast, Joel Jaeggli, 08/07/2002
- RE: IPv6 Multicast, Alan Crosswell, 08/07/2002
- RE: IPv6 Multicast, Kevin C. Almeroth, 08/07/2002
- RE: IPv6 Multicast, Michael H. Lambert, 08/07/2002
- Re: IPv6 Multicast, David Meyer, 08/07/2002
- Re: IPv6 Multicast, Marshall Eubanks, 08/07/2002
- Re: IPv6 Multicast, David Meyer, 08/07/2002
- Re: IPv6 Multicast, Marshall Eubanks, 08/07/2002
- Re: IPv6 Multicast, Lucy E. Lynch, 08/07/2002
- Re: IPv6 Multicast, Marshall Eubanks, 08/07/2002
- Re: IPv6 Multicast, David Farmer, 08/07/2002
- Re: IPv6 Multicast, Marshall Eubanks, 08/07/2002
- Re: IPv6 Multicast, Bill Nickless, 08/07/2002
- Re: IPv6 Multicast, owens, 08/07/2002
- Re: IPv6 Multicast, Marshall Eubanks, 08/07/2002
- Re: IPv6 Multicast, David Meyer, 08/07/2002
- MSDP stinks? [Was Re: IPv6 Multicast], Bill Nickless, 08/07/2002
- RE: IPv6 Multicast, Michael H. Lambert, 08/07/2002
- RE: IPv6 Multicast, Kevin C. Almeroth, 08/07/2002
- Re: IPv6 Multicast, Alan Crosswell, 08/07/2002
- Re: IPv6 Multicast, Marshall Eubanks, 08/13/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.