All things related to multicast

[Greg Shepherd <>]

Brent,

I'm back on earth this week, so let me know if my help today would be more
than just an annouance.

Greg

On Mon, 13 May 2002, Bill Owens wrote:

> At 16:23 -0500 5/10/02, Brent Sweeny wrote:
> >folks, for the last several days we (Abilene) are seeing frequent--and
> >even weirder--simultaneous resets of msdp sessions on Abilene, and
> >can't quite figure out what's going wrong.  here are some data points,
> >and I'll ask some questions at the end.
>
> I will sheepishly admit to not having looked at the logs on our
> Junipers in some time, and just finding that the resets apparently
> started in Buffalo quite a while ago:
>
> Dec 30 04:26:49 buf-m20 rpd[573]: RPD_MSDP_PEER_DOWN: MSDP peer
> 199.109.2.2 peer-group Abilene-Buf out of Established
> Dec 30 04:27:36 buf-m20 rpd[573]: RPD_MSDP_PEER_DOWN: MSDP peer
> 199.109.2.2 peer-group Abilene-Buf out of Established
> Dec 30 04:53:47 buf-m20 rpd[573]: RPD_MSDP_PEER_DOWN: MSDP peer
> 199.109.2.2 peer-group Abilene-Buf out of Established
> Dec 30 04:57:41 buf-m20 last message repeated 2 times
> Dec 30 05:14:51 buf-m20 rpd[573]: RPD_MSDP_PEER_DOWN: MSDP peer
> 199.109.2.2 peer-group Abilene-Buf out of Established
>
> But they didn't start in NYC until recently:
>
> May  3 14:02:04 nyc-m20-0 rpd[587]: RPD_MSDP_PEER_DOWN: MSDP peer
> 199.109.5.2 peer-group Abilene-NYC out of Established
> May  3 14:02:40 nyc-m20-0 rpd[587]: RPD_MSDP_PEER_DOWN: MSDP peer
> 199.109.5.2 peer-group Abilene-NYC out of Established
> May  3 14:04:19 nyc-m20-0 last message repeated 5 times
> May  3 14:14:23 nyc-m20-0 last message repeated 28 times
> May  3 14:19:33 nyc-m20-0 last message repeated 6 times
>
> Our other Juniper, roc-m10, does not peer with Abilene and hasn't
> seen any resets on the MSDP peers within NYSERNet. Those peers
> include one GSR that had been on 12.0(15)S and jumped directly to
> 12.0(21)S1 a month or so ago. Our Junipers have progressed through
> the usual set of releases and are now on 5.2R2.3. If there's any
> debugging that we can do, just let me know. Watching things after
> CLEV goes to 12.0(21)S tonight will be a good test. . .
>
> Bill.
>
>