All things related to multicast

[Amel Caldwell <>]

Does anyone know how the timing correlates to the XMIM crashing problems Lucy
Lynch described? Just wondering out loud if it is the same problem.

Amel


On Mon, 13 May 2002, Bill Owens wrote:

>At 16:23 -0500 5/10/02, Brent Sweeny wrote:
>>folks, for the last several days we (Abilene) are seeing frequent--and
>>even weirder--simultaneous resets of msdp sessions on Abilene, and
>>can't quite figure out what's going wrong.  here are some data points,
>>and I'll ask some questions at the end.
>
>I will sheepishly admit to not having looked at the logs on our
>Junipers in some time, and just finding that the resets apparently
>started in Buffalo quite a while ago:
>
>Dec 30 04:26:49 buf-m20 rpd[573]: RPD_MSDP_PEER_DOWN: MSDP peer
>199.109.2.2 peer-group Abilene-Buf out of Established
>Dec 30 04:27:36 buf-m20 rpd[573]: RPD_MSDP_PEER_DOWN: MSDP peer
>199.109.2.2 peer-group Abilene-Buf out of Established
>Dec 30 04:53:47 buf-m20 rpd[573]: RPD_MSDP_PEER_DOWN: MSDP peer
>199.109.2.2 peer-group Abilene-Buf out of Established
>Dec 30 04:57:41 buf-m20 last message repeated 2 times
>Dec 30 05:14:51 buf-m20 rpd[573]: RPD_MSDP_PEER_DOWN: MSDP peer
>199.109.2.2 peer-group Abilene-Buf out of Established
>
>But they didn't start in NYC until recently:
>
>May  3 14:02:04 nyc-m20-0 rpd[587]: RPD_MSDP_PEER_DOWN: MSDP peer
>199.109.5.2 peer-group Abilene-NYC out of Established
>May  3 14:02:40 nyc-m20-0 rpd[587]: RPD_MSDP_PEER_DOWN: MSDP peer
>199.109.5.2 peer-group Abilene-NYC out of Established
>May  3 14:04:19 nyc-m20-0 last message repeated 5 times
>May  3 14:14:23 nyc-m20-0 last message repeated 28 times
>May  3 14:19:33 nyc-m20-0 last message repeated 6 times
>
>Our other Juniper, roc-m10, does not peer with Abilene and hasn't
>seen any resets on the MSDP peers within NYSERNet. Those peers
>include one GSR that had been on 12.0(15)S and jumped directly to
>12.0(21)S1 a month or so ago. Our Junipers have progressed through
>the usual set of releases and are now on 5.2R2.3. If there's any
>debugging that we can do, just let me know. Watching things after
>CLEV goes to 12.0(21)S tonight will be a good test. . .
>
>Bill.
>
>