All things related to multicast

[Magnus Danielson <>]

From: Marshall Eubanks 
<>
Subject: Re: MSDP Storm
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 10:00:33 -0500

> Hello Magnus;

Dear Marshall,

> Magnus Danielson wrote:
> > 
> > From: Marshall Eubanks 
> > <>
> > Subject: Re: MSDP Storm
> > Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 13:39:44 -0500
> > 
> > > I would agree. Mischievously, I would point out that there is an IGMP 
> > > v3 RFC grinding along :
> > >  <draft-ietf-idmr-igmp-v3-05.txt>
> > > AND a MSDP draft grinding along as well :
> > > <draft-ietf-msdp-spec-06.txt>
> > >
> > 
> > The actual numbers should never be put into that RFC. If specific numbers 
> > are
> > required, then you should have a separate RFC also running as a BCP to 
> > detail
> > it and updates can be made according to need.
> 
> Correct, although a mboned BCP might not be a bad idea.

IMHO Mboned is the correct IETF WG for such a BCP. I just didn't imply the WG
to do the BCP in question.

Cheers,
Magnus