Shibboleth Developers

[Chad La Joie <>]

Okay, this is what I ended up doing.  The pluggable criteria mechanism 
being used in various other places is now used here and it has access to 
the full profile request context.  So, as we go forward, we'll just need 
to make sure that whatever data we need lives in there.

On 6/23/11 7:21 PM, Cantor, Scott E. wrote:
> On 6/23/11 4:29 PM, "Chad La 
> Joie"<>
>   wrote:
>
> > Yeah, I'm iterating through a lot of ideas on this right now.  So far,
> > I've considered three possibilities:
> >   - leave it as is
> >   - Double the properties we have today and make one set for
> > front-channel and the other set for back-channel.  However, this means
> > the IdP will need to directly understand those concept (it doesn't today).
> >   - Have a pluggable strategy.
>
> I definitely favor the last one, even if it's rarely used, it just avoids
> arguing over it. Assuming our new profile context objects are sufficiently
> easy to use as a generic input to the decision process anyway.
>
> -- Scott

--
Chad La Joie
http://itumi.biz
trusted identities, delivered